Can you start sentences with also

Moreover, she was running very fast. In addition, she was running very fast. Furthermore, she was running very fast. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! By yeah I agree that however looks better between commas and not at the beginning for the sentence. Why are we trying to altar the English language as we know it?

It appears to me that this follows the whole idea of dumbing us down to accomodate more people who find it too difficult to learn or teach. As a current high school student, I find that this rule is rarely enforced at all. And I would like to start all my sentences with conjuctions.

But I was taught not to. Yet I do so in defiance. For I will not fall victim to obtuse conventions. Nor succumb to insane rants.

So forgive me, those who feel otherwise. Or not. Language changes over time. It is a fact and it is important. Starting a sentence with a conjunction is just another trend and probably a good one.

Anything that adds to the utility and available options for expression is a good thing. Anyone ever try to read any Latin? If you have you would probably agree that so far, for the most part, it has been a good thing. Are pronounced identically, except that the second might imply a slightly longer pause. I had a speaker going on and on and on connecting clauses and phrases with and. Once I started some sentences with and, it started making sense. You can start sentences with and.

But,And ,Because English grammer teachers said dont use them,i found it ok on net and learned to write from my father who is an expert. I am curretly teaching English as a foreig language in Japan. I found that the text book occasionally starts sentences with conjuctions and it really irritates me. While I am as guilty as the rest for bending grammatical rules in order to make my writing easy to understand, I find it a nightmare to each kids when they can and cannot use but or and to start a sentence.

In the end I just refused to allow it because whenever I asked the kids to write 5 sentences I was always getting one sentence chopped ino two using but or and as a starting word. When it comes to teaching foreigners, however, trying to explain what is inherently learnt amongst natives becomes too much of a headache.

It seems that as long as their is subject verb agreement then the sentence can start with whatever you want it to. I so wish they had a like, thumbs up, or down button. There are just too many points. Either joining it to the sentence before or creating a new sentence all together. Not if you are British or Australian, learned has a different meaning somebody with high levels of learning ie. Although, as a Brit, I concede to use the Americanisms smelled, burned and learned because they look better on the page, although, British readers always notice them and complain.

As for starting with conjunctions. Yes, yes yes! And especially when using devices like polysyndeton, fragments and run on sentences to generate pace, exasperation and rhetoric. All grammar rules can and should be broken, especially when writing fiction.

A grammatically correct sentence is not necessarily a good sentence, and a grammatically incorrect sentence is not necessarily a bad sentence either. Clarity, flow and meaning are far more important. The acceptance of this rule has irritated me to the hilt. I think it is interesting that whenever people justify a language issue by stating that language has changed through time, it is always to disestablish old rules, not create new or re-establish old ones.

Using this context as validation is specious. If that is the case we might as well bury capitalization, title case, the hyphen, colons and semi-colons, and all the other sophisticated tools used to articulate thoughts. I am thoroughly supportive of the English language changing. Nevertheless, the direction and type of change is also important.

Language is not just for communication, but also for the articulation of thoughts and the environment. If the idea of a conjunction is to join words, phrases and clauses how can it be correct to separate the two parts of the sentence just before the conjunction by adding a full stop!? It has only been a solecism since tidy-minded Victorians set about placing strictures on the living language of Englishmen, learned and otherwise. To protest that the Bible was written thousands of years ago is neither here nor there.

Thirdly, we, of necessity, begin spoken sentences with conjunctions day in and out. And quite properly. Fourthly, grammar is about conveying meaning; nothing more and nothing less. Pity no one picked it up. However, I have one doubt.

From what I read such use of a coordinating conjunction at the beginning of a sentence also necessitates the need for it to be followed by a main clause. However, I totally agree with Gary about changes in language: it requires thought, diligence, rigor, and discipline. Gary, I completely disagree. I think that making English grammar far more easy to understand would be desirable in this age.

An adverb is a word that modifies an adjective or verb. It helps to give a relation of place, manner, cause, time, and the degree to the rest of the sentence. In short, it gives you the word to describe things. It is acceptable to begin a sentence with also. As we mentioned, it helps to join thoughts together, so it is useful in science when trying to make cohesive links between sections.

By placing the also at the start of the sentence, these two separate pieces of information are now linked together. One of the main reasons you might have been told not to start a sentence with also is because it can make the writer sound disorganised. It can make the sentence that follows also seem like an afterthought.

This is commonly something we use in speech rather than writing and where it can trip us up. In writing though, readers might spend some time trying to figure out what the rest of the sentence was relating to, rather than moving on with the reading.

So, be careful! There are other times when also might appear at the start of the sentence. Because Many of our teachers taught us not to begin a sentence with because.

Poor Because retinitis pigmentosa is only one of the leading causes of vision loss, we undertook this retrospective study. However As with because , there is nothing wrong with beginning a sentence with however , but the new sentence should always relate to the sentence preceding it e. Good Fifteen of the saplings in the test plot were free of Pucciniales infection, 4 had minor lesions, and 6 had severe lesions at the end of the test period. However, all of the saplings with lesions showed good growth.

Poor Fifteen of the saplings in the test plot were free of Pucciniales infection, 4 had minor lesions, and 6 had severe lesions at the end of the test period. However, two saplings were also infected with root rot. Muffin had six kittens over the weekend. However we tried to give them away.